Weekend Reading Notes
I love three day weekends. I love the idea of three long empty days stretched out before me that I can fill however I see fit. I have a feeling that our Fourth of July is going to be a bit of a washout as it's raining at the moment and we're predicted to have storms most of the weekend. I don't really mind as my plans were pretty much to not have any plans and just putter about. Let me qualify that--rain is okay, but nothing severe. After last year's bad weather I now have a fear of really strong winds. That aside, I just want to play hermit and catch up on reading and listen to rain pattering against the windows. (Not very summery at all, am I?).
I set a goal for my June reading, which I actually accomplished. I've caught up on all my 'obligation' reads and now plan on spending the rest of the summer just reading according to whim. At the moment I'm content to get back to the books I have let languish on my night stand. There are a couple that have been long neglected and I'm looking forward to getting back to those particularly. I really enjoyed Stefan Zweig's The Post-Office Girl earlier this year. I think it is easily one of my favorite reads so far in 2009. I had actually started reading his Beware of Pity prior to that. This novel is set just before WWI and it's an excellent story about honor and misunderstood emotions. I've been reading it this morning and have found I could easily sink back into the story.
I've also been thinking a lot about reading more mysteries, but I seem to be stalled in Nicola Upson's An Expert in Murder. This is not at all a reflection of poorly told story. I just can't seem to situate myself again, and I think what I need is to spend a couple of solid hours reading it to get going again. I'm a third of the way in, and there's no going back now. It's set in London (primarily the West End) in 1934, which is the period I'm really interested in at the moment. I think it doesn't help that I've been contemplating what I'm going to read next, so am getting restless. I've been thinking of Henning Mankell (someone at the gym raved about him and so many other readers have as well), Barbara Cleverly (those Joe Sandilands mysteries I just mentioned), Stieg Larsson that everyone has been reading and talking about, Agatha Christie (just because her books sound appealing right now), or maybe a mystery by the real Josephine Tey, and am definitely in the mood for Ruth Rendell/Barbara Vine. Of course I could just go ahead and pick up one of these (ahem...I've been known to do that on occasion), but then I'm afraid I'll just ignore the Upson mystery even longer!
I've been reading a bit of A.S. Byatt's The Children's Book each day and am enjoying it immensely. Why have I not picked up any of her other books. I think after reading Possession she seemed like such a formidable writer. If I ever have a hard time trying to figure out which books are fiction and which are literature, she's sort of my bar that I compare authors to. Her books are definitely literature and not just fiction. However, The Children's Book is not at all hard going, she simply takes her time telling her story, weaving her story really. The descriptions are so lush, it's a bit of sensory overload, but I like it.
I do plan on spending a lot of time with Emile Zola's Thérèse Raquin this weekend. Whatever possessed me to start not just one but two other classics (along with the Dickens) is beyond me. Pure bookish gluttony I guess. The Zola is filled with passion, but passion isn't always a good thing. I hope to finish it this weekend (and then will move on to the Wilkie Collins). Poor Dickens is the book most neglected and I'm thinking I very soon need to simply devote myself to it alone and finish it. I'm a third of the way in (keeping in mind it is over 900 pages). I could probably finish it in just a couple of weeks if I concentrated on it alone. I have a vague recollection of planning my 'epic read' this year (which is a four volume set--each volume containing three novels....). At the midpoint of the year I haven't even finished the Dickens. I won't even tell you how many books in that photo (those books I am going to read in 2009...) that I have actually read. Okay, one. I started three others then abandoned them, but perhaps that's a subject best left to another post.
Are you still with me? I didn't mean to make this so long. I will just mention one more book. Emma Smith's The Great Western Beach is a delightful book to read. I ration a bit out each day (it's generally my lunchtime reading). I can't really tell you what it's about--it's just random memories of living by the seaside, but she has such an endearing way of writing about her subject you can't but help being drawn in. I do plan on starting a new book, and I had thought it would be her novel, The Far Cry. It's about a young woman's voyage to India, but I'm just not sure that's what I'm in the mood for. Perhaps it would be better to read the memoir first and the novel later, since they seem very different. Which means I'm not really sure which Persephone it is going to be. Maybe one of the books I just bought. Or maybe Saplings, which Darlene has made sound so enticing. Choosing a Persephone novel to read is always problematic (too many good choices being the problem).
As you can see my reading has been all over the place in the last few days (just how I like it, really). Somehow, though I think I might need more than three days off, but I can work with what they give me! Happy Fourth to those who are celebrating it--I hope you get in some good reading, too!