My Photo

Bookish Places

Categories

Blog powered by TypePad

« Two More War Stories | Main | It's Here! R.I.P. III »

Comments

Jenny

These lists always strike me as very odd. For instance, why put The Complete Works of Shakespeare and Hamlet on there separately? Or the Chronicles of Narnia and The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe? Anyway, the idea of being "well-read" is very subjective and if we went back to the Renaissance there isn't one person in a million today who would count as well-read. (Or then, either, considering literacy rates.) So cut yourself a break! Read what you love and keep blogging about it. That's what I count on!

Dorothy W.

It looks to me like you are quite well read! Having read even a quarter of those books is pretty good, I think, and most likely people may have read an author, just not the title listed here. The lists make me wonder who generated them and what the rationale was.

Sylvia

That's a great list! But I'm shocked that you haven't read Charlie and the Chocolate Factory! It's such a delight. You really must set aside an afternoon for it, preferably with your favourite chocolate bar by your side. :)

kristen m.

I think this list is actually from a BBC survey to find out what book was the favorite in Britain. I've read about half of them which makes me just feel like I read a lot of classics and mainstream lit and should be a bit more adventurous!

Danielle

Jenny--It's interesting to think what that phrase really means--'well read' and how it changes over time. I'm mostly just thinking of all the classics I have sitting waiting for me, but as long as I'm reading books I like I can't really ask for more. The list is a little odd, but still I thought it was surprisingly good considering it was from a survey.
Dorothy--If I counted right, I've read 42, which isn't too shabby, is it?! Of course then I have to consider all the good books I've read that didn't make the list. And it is curious why so many lists are out there--I guess newspapers know lists appeal to readers perhaps (not really the best reason to make one I suppose, but I always stop and look at them).
Sylvia--I've never read any Roald Dahl--that's sort of sad, isn't it. I've seen the movie scores of times, but movies never compare to the book. Any book that requires chocolate while reading has to be good. I'd choose dark chocolate. Maybe I'll just add it to my list.
Kristen--I figured it must be something like that, though I didn't see where the list originated. I am trying to read more classics, but I also read whatever other book (new or old) piques my curiosity!

Matt

A very plausible list except they repeat Hamlet and Complete Shakespeare. Well, they're Brits! I can see how they give a heavier weight to classics and literature. This is very different from, say, if NPR compiles a list of 100.

I'm glad to see that major works of Russian literature make the list, but sad that Jose Saramago doesn't.

Jessica

Who picks these things anyway?

litlove

You have still read way more than I have! I'm really bad at getting through the classics. I'd love to see a list of favourite popular fiction and see whether I do better on that!

Carl V.

I've actually read 17, which isn't much but I was expecting even less so I'm pretty happy! :)

Unless of course you count that I've read Dracula probably a dozen or more times!

Lisa

I don't really worry all that much about being "well-read", but I do stress sometimes when I think about all the great books that I'll never get around to reading. I love these types of lists even though there's always room for disagreement with the selections. I think they're fun. I like to go through and see how many I've read.

Pip

OK, if that is the list of favourite books chosen by the Brirish public, I feel like I might be far too British. I usually get about a third to half of these lists but I have read 88 of those books.
I am a bit scared by that.

Danielle

Matt--It is interesting to see who is picking the books. I've read more on this list than on others, which surprised me. I still need to read Saramago...
Jessica--It sounds like this might have been a reader's poll?
Litlove--You would do well on that sort of list. I wonder how well I would do, as I read a lot of contemporary authors, but they tend to be off the beaten track. Maybe I'd do really well on a list of best historical fiction? :)
Carl--Wow, that is a lot of times to read any book! I wouldn't mind rereading it some time. I tend to read a lot of the autthors on these lists but maybe not the exact book they choose.
Lisa--I think about that too. When I see all the books on a list I haven't read, and many of them I do want to read...I know I will never get to them all. I like seeing how many I've read as well, which is why I am drawn to these lists.
Pip--I tend to read more British Lit than American. This list seems to be pretty varied in authors, though. 88 is an impressive number!!

chihiro

I really find these lists very interesting but what i don't like at all is how they put the Anglo-Saxon literary world in the centre. There is so many great books written in German, Italian, French, Japanese and other languages - why put a few novels by Jane Austen instead?! Honestly, not all of the books on the list are worth reading at all. I'd rather check the Literature Nobel Prize Winners' list and see there which authors I've read and which I haven't. The English are quite notorious of neglecting books published in translation and that's the reason I don't like any lists of 'books to read' being published here.

Danielle

Chihiro--I think you're very right about English speakers being very english-language-centric when talking about good books! I think the Observer has a list that is much more varied with works in translation. I think it is actually the same in America. There are really so few books translated here compared to how many could be given the chance. I try to look for them, but I know I don't really do a good job of reading foreign works. It is something I keep thinking about, but don't always do. It's always good to be reminded! :)

The comments to this entry are closed.

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Reading Along

MJ Farrell/Molly Keane Reading Project

Books Read in 2012

Books Read in 2011

Books Read in 2010

Books Read in 2009

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter