I'm going to take a day off from posting and instead share an article about the city of Paris that was illuminating in light of reading Thad Carhart's Across the Endless River. Parts of the story are set in 1820s Paris, so it's nice to have these visuals and imagine Baptiste riding his horse through the streets of Paris in one of the quarters. Of course there is no need to have read the book, anyone who has visited the city (or seen it from afar in pictures and films) will appreciate this essay. Paris (along with Vienna) is one of my favorites places. I like the fact that in many ways it hasn't changed over the centuries. For me that only adds to its enormous charm. But please read on for an insider's (and writer's) view of this most elegant of cities.
Reposted with permission from the author, Thad Carhart.
Imagining the Past in Paris
To walk in Paris is to walk through multiple layers of the past, more than 900 years of built history that awaits any stroller. Having lived here for twenty years, I've seen the city change with new roads and bridges, new museums, new rows of apartments. And yet the deep respect that Parisians have developed for what they call their patrimoine, their inheritance, ensures that old buildings are regularly restored and preserved, integrated into the flux of daily life. The look of the city changes subtly, as it has throughout history.
The biggest transformation in modern times was simply the cleaning of the stone edifices of central Paris, initiated in the 1960s by de Gaulle's Minister of Culture, André Malraux. No change could have been more surprising, or more deeply satisfying. When I was a very young boy living in Paris, I was convinced that all of the buildings were made from the same stone, black as night and so softened by centuries of wood and coal dust that the surface was a felt-like matte whose edges looked as if they would soon crumble. This was the "atmospheric" Paris of all those voluptuous black-and-white photos (what blacks and grays there were on every side), the ponderous Paris of Buffet prints and countless tourist posters.
Then the government started to clean the major monuments one by one -- Notre-Dame, the Arc de Triomphe, the Louvre -- and the transformation was shocking, almost troubling in its strange newness. The buildings of Paris weren't black after all, but very nearly . . . white! It took almost two decades of careful cleaning and restoration, but Paris emerged from the process the albino twin of its former self. To appreciate the contrast, buy a vintage postcard aerial view, dating from 1970 or earlier, at one of the bouquiniste stalls along the banks of the Seine, then compare it with the present-day aerial shot: the era of dirt and grime looks like a photographic negative of the light and airy Paris that the current tourists will recognize as the "real" Paris.
Walking, however, reveals just one facet of the landscape. Recently, in researching a historical novel, I needed to imagine Paris as it would have appeared in the 1820s. The first stop for any such endeavor is the splendid Musée Carnavalet, the Museum of the City of Paris, whose collection documents in elaborate and fascinating detail every step of the city's past. As I consulted paintings, prints, and manuscripts, many of the differences were obvious: in 1825 the Champs-Elysées was already a broad, fashionable avenue, but the Arc de Triomphe did not yet grace its rise; the Eiffel Tower wouldn't appear until 1889; and, of course, Beaubourg, the Pyramid of the Louvre, and the Grande Arche, all sturdy Paris fixtures today, would only appear within the last four decades.
Another clear difference was the absence of cars, though factoring them out mentally also involved imagining the presence of horses . . . lots of horses. As I examined the numberless paintings at Carnavalet, I thought a lot about the look, the sound, and the smell of tens of thousands of horses plying the streets of Paris close to 200 years ago. Merely disposing of their manure -- and Paris was very well organized in this department -- was a Herculean task daily. And, just as in our day, when playboys often drive Porsches and tradesmen more likely use vans, the paintings reveal fancy thoroughbreds ridden solo by dandies, sturdy draft horses pulling huge wagons, and bony nags hitched to battered carts.
Perhaps the biggest surprise that comes with seeking the past in the Paris landscape, especially after examining the documentary record, is to realize how little the scale of the buildings has changed over the centuries. With two exceptions on the Left Bank (the Tour Montparnasse and the university's Tour Jussieu), no high-rises spoil the illusion in the center of Paris that the modern age has yet arrived. Individual facades, a modern infrastructure, and hordes of cars all tell a different story, but the look and feel of many of quartiers -- the Marais and the Latin Quarter are simply the best known examples -- would feel appropriate to a Parisian of the early nineteenth century. This tenuous, heady relationship to the past is often seductive, and yet it can also feel weighty, old-fashioned, and artificial. How long it can prevail in the face of change is anybody's guess.
Thank you so much for posting this article. Paris is one of my favourite cities.
Posted by: Ellen | November 12, 2009 at 02:04 AM
How fascinating to think about what Paris (or any place, really) was like in the past -- how it would have looked and smelled and sounded. It's so much fun to get details that help me imagine what it was like.
Posted by: Dorothy W. | November 12, 2009 at 09:01 PM
I visited Musee Carnavalet last year. It is a fascinating place, and unusually admission is free. It is in the Marais area. Interestingly it also used to be the home of Madame de Sevigne, 17th century aristocrat whose letters are still in print and worth reading.
Posted by: Ed | November 12, 2009 at 09:23 PM
Ellen--I was fortunate enough to go to France not just once but twice. I would go again in a heartbeat--it's such a lovely place. So perfectly designed!
Dorothy--This is what I love about Europe--they embrace their history, whereas here (in my city anyway) many of the historical buildings have been demolished. Not all the the more modern buildings are as pleasing to me. I like thinking about what it would have been like, too. And I had not thought about all those horses--that must have been something (and something to clean up!).
Ed--I didn't visit this museum when I was there, but if I ever go back I will certainly put it on my list. It's not often you get free admission to a museum either! I will have to look up Mme de Sevigne now--and see what the Musee Carnavalet looked like. Imagine living in what is now a museum!
Posted by: Danielle | November 12, 2009 at 10:20 PM
I just started this book, which I received as a review copy from LibraryThing. This passage makes me want to really sink my teeth into it.
Posted by: Mike B. | November 13, 2009 at 08:19 AM
Mike--I hope you enjoy the book. This is actually an article the author wrote separate from the book, but it's really interesting in light of his novel! I like thinking of what Paris must have been like!
Posted by: Danielle | November 13, 2009 at 09:31 PM