I wonder how many people saw the 2002 adaptation of John Galsworthy's The Forsyte Saga (or maybe even the 1967 version), and like me instantly went out and bought the book. Actually I saw part of the film preferring to read the book first and see the movie later. And then I wonder how many people took a look at the very large omnibus edition and left it on their bookcase to molder away for years feeling the tiniest bit intimidated by the sheer size, the tiny print and the idea of a very lengthy classic. My edition contains the first three books that make up The Forsyte Saga plus the two shorter interludes.
It's only recently that I learned the story is actually comprised of nine novels, and they have been published separately. For some reason I feel far more ambitious reading all nine novels individually, if I can take little breaks in between, than attempting the hefty omnibus edition that only has the first three novels but well over 800 pages in one go. Besides the set of nine books has such luscious covers and they look so elegant sitting next to each other on your bookshelf. Really, though, there's nothing to be afraid of I've discovered.
Upon introduction to the Forsytes in The Man of Property things can be somewhat overwhelming. There are so many of them, several generations worth and in the opening chapter they are all gathered together to celebrate the engagement of June Forsyte with Philip Bosinney who has been dubbed "the buccaneer". A young man of no fortune, but progressive ideals, he's an architect. That alone makes him stand out amongst the moneyed clan and very upper class Forsytes. "Man of property" is a phrase that's going to be bandied about often in this novel. The Victorian era is waning, but most of the Forsytes are still deeply mired in the sensibilities of a class bound and determined to create wealth and have all the physical niceties to show for it. They are only a few generations removed from an agricultural background so wealth and possessions are very important to them.
Soames Forsyte is a true connoisseur of lovely things, and if anyone in this story is a man of property it is Soames. As a matter of fact he is often called "the man of property", though not necessarily in a polite context. Next to his paintings, Irene, his wife, is his most prize possession. You might even say, his property. He had to have her when they met, and despite turning down his many offers of marriage, he finally wore her down. Beautiful and artistic she is the antithesis of what the Forsytes stand for, and only too late does she discover (though maybe she knew all along?) what a mistake her marriage is. Like so many women of that period she married him for convenience and stability, as it would be such a "good marriage."
Irene and June are close friends, so close that Soames would like to take Irene away from London to the country where she won't be under anyone else's influence. So he hires Bosinney to build him a country house on a well situated and attractive piece of land. By now, though, there are whisperings amongst the Forsytes about Irene and Bosinney. It's obvious she doesn't love Soames, but he doesn't quite believe she's capable of treachery. Bosinney is an artist with impeccable taste. The house he builds isn't just a country home but a work of art down to all the smallest details and tempers flare each time he exceeds the budget Soames has set for him. At the beginning of the story the Forsytes are brought together as a family in celebration, but by the end they will be estranged.
I don't want to give too much of the plot away, but just enough so you'll go grab the book yourself and start reading. I've left all the best parts for you to discover. This is a wonderful social satire that is full of "drama, passion, and scandal" just like the book promises. The cast is very large but manageable once the story starts really moving. And while this isn't a story with a lot of action, the characters are so fully formed and completely flawed you can't help but be drawn into their lives. It doesn't matter whether they are likable or not, you still want to know them. Soames is a fairly reprehensible character, but I still felt pity for him. He truly didn't understand how he could love Irene so much yet she couldn't or wouldn't love him back. Irene is a bit of an enigma. The reader is never let into her head to know what she really wants or feels, only through her actions is any idea given of what she thinks. For a novel that verges on melodrama it is quite complex and has left me with much to think about.
I'm curious to see what will happen next with the Forsytes and will be able to find out soon in In Chancery, though I am taking a little interlude myself and reading another short classic before continuing on. I believe Series I of the 2002 film adaptation covers the first two books, and Series II the third book. I've heard the adaptation is excellent and can't wait to watch it. I wonder if I will be able to make it through the remaining eight books before the end of the year? If the first is anything to go by, the story is certainly addicting. why aren't more people reading him?
I have read this and the next two books, and without giving any of the plot away, Soames does become more sympathetic in the later books. The TV series also portrayed him sympathetically.
Posted by: Ed | March 17, 2010 at 05:15 PM
I definitely agree with Ed's comment above, the Soames does become more sympathetic as you progress through the series. Indeed, by the last book...well, you must read it for yourself.
Posted by: Claire (The Captive Reader) | March 17, 2010 at 05:47 PM
I loved the 2002 Forsyte Saga and have wanted to read it ever since. You've encouraged me!
Posted by: Tricia | March 17, 2010 at 06:41 PM
I definitely plan on reading this at some point. I really like the idea of having nine novels to read! I think I will read the slowly, one at a time, when I get there, much like you describe doing.
Posted by: Dorothy W. | March 17, 2010 at 06:52 PM
Sticks hand up and confesses to having watched the 1967 version. Can I seriously be that old...
Posted by: Cath | March 17, 2010 at 07:07 PM
I'm glad you enjoyed The Man of property Danielle, I've read and enjoyed all nine novels of the saga and would also recommend the 2002 adaption. I agree that the plot summary can sound melodramatic but reading it you are invested in the characters and given plenty to think about.
Virgina Woolf wrote an interesting essay about Galsworthy and other realist English novels called Mr. Bennett and Mrs. Brown whih you might like to read and partially explains why Galsworthy lost popularity- modernism arrived!
Posted by: Sarah | March 17, 2010 at 08:17 PM
I read the first 3 books and loved them! I need to get to the rest of the novels.
Posted by: Amanda A. | March 17, 2010 at 08:30 PM
Oh, I love a good saga! Will have to add this to my TBR list!
Posted by: Marg | March 17, 2010 at 08:43 PM
What an excellent review! Galsworthy is such a great writer, and I'm so happy to see you writing about his masterpiece. I enjoyed the Masterpiece Theater adaptations, too.
Posted by: Kat | March 17, 2010 at 09:28 PM
Ed--He's not a nice person to say the least in the first book, but I did feel sorry for him despite his bad behavior. I'm really looking forward to picking up the next book and will do so very soon!
Claire--I like characters who are so multifaceted and make you think--I have a feeling more of the Forsytes are going to elicit just such a response! And I can't wait to find out more...
Tricia--I caught part of the series, but knew I wanted to read the books. It's taken me a while, but I can highly recommend the first one anyway--and I expect the other books just get better. And I have heard excellent things about the film!
Dorothy--I'd love to get them all read this year, but if I don't that's okay, too. At least with the first book--once you start you don't want to put the book down. So I will space them out a bit but just keep going I hope.
Cath--I've heard the 1967 version is really good, too. I might have to rejoin Netflix to see if I can get my hands on the episodes as I think they filmed the entire saga!
Sarah--It verges on melodrama, but it's definitely above that. He was an excellent writer and his characters are so interesting. I have read a little about Virginia Woolf's remarks on his work. He came at a bad time--he doesn't seem to be part of that Victorian era really (since he seems to satirize their behavior), but he wasn't a modernist either. I might wait to read VW's thoughts and just enjoy the books--modernism sort of rolled over everything in the arts!
Amanda--I can't believe I waited so long--what was I thinking? What was I afraid of?!
Marg--Yes, do. I think you'll like this. I think the other books are going to just get better.
Kat--I didn't write half of what I wanted--how do you talk about a book without giving too much away? Thank you for your post which made me pick these up in the first place. I went back and looked at your other posts and think it's cool you read this when you were studying!
Posted by: Danielle | March 17, 2010 at 10:32 PM
I've seen these books before (different editions) but for some reason, they never captured my attention as much as your review has. I enjoy reading about architects and houses and will add these to the TBR list!
Posted by: Debby | March 17, 2010 at 11:21 PM
I'm with Cath - and admit to watching the 1967 version! I also watched in 2002. I was captivated both times. I've yet to read the books though.
Posted by: BooksPlease | March 18, 2010 at 01:34 AM
I've said it before but I still mean it - I really want to read this! I have a big penguin omnibus edition with three novels in it, I think. I'll have to start there.
Posted by: litlove | March 18, 2010 at 03:34 AM
I remember watching the original television series which was showed on the BBC on Sunday nights in 1967. It was riviting TV so much so that I have not attempted the books. Maybe I should now give them a try.
Posted by: Jennifer Dee | March 18, 2010 at 03:38 AM
I watched the 2002 version and went straight out and bought the books. But I haven't read them yet...I must. You've summarised the plot so well, considering how complex it is.
Posted by: Sakura | March 18, 2010 at 08:34 AM
Love the series and I even felt a little sorry for Soames later ageing and seeing his daughter twist him round her finger.
Posted by: Jodie | March 18, 2010 at 11:29 AM
By coincidence, A Man of Property arrived in the post yesterday!
I loved the 1967 TV drama version far better than the more recent one. Anyone who can remember the 1967 version may also remember Michael Mont, who was played by actor Nicholas Pennell. In the 1950s, when I was a girl and Nicholas and his parents and brothers and sister, were our next door neighbours. He was about 17 then and he used to come into our home to play the piano as his family did not have one. He went to RADA and we thought he had made his big break with the Forsyte Saga but although he had a small part in David Hemmings' film, Blow Up, an iconic 1960s movie, nothing else much happened. Then he went to Canada, to Stratford, Ontario, where he became a Shakespearian actor. Sadly, he died several years ago, but thinking of the Forsyte Saga always makes me think, also, of Nicholas.
Posted by: Margaret Powling | March 18, 2010 at 12:03 PM
I watched the movie and then read the omnibus edition. Loved it!
Posted by: Amy | March 18, 2010 at 03:00 PM
After seeing the miniseries, I picked up a copy at an estate sale. The sheer size left me intimidated. Your post has given me a little confidence. Thanks.
Posted by: Mary Ellen | March 18, 2010 at 03:50 PM
Your post reminded me I've been meaning to read The Forsyte Saga since I saw the miniseries ages ago, and then something about the first photo in this blog post (http://www.howtobearetronaut.com/2010/03/a-colour-photograph-of-fleet-street-at-five-to-two-on-a-sunny-sunday-afternoon-in-1924/) reminded me of it again, and now I'm seriously considering ignoring the two books I'm already in the middle of and starting it. I loved the miniseries.
Posted by: Anna | March 18, 2010 at 06:13 PM
I've read the first 6 books & have an omnibus with the final 3 sitting on the tbr shelf. Maybe this will be the year for me to finish the Saga? I also loved the 1990s series although everyone who was around for the 1960s series says it doesn't compare. Did you know that in the UK, church attendances went down on Sunday evenings because that's when it was broadcast? It was a phenomenon! Lovely review, Dani.
Posted by: Lyn | March 18, 2010 at 08:55 PM
I think I must have an edition that has all the novels in it because it is really fat. I've not read it yet because of the isze but now that you said it is actually 9 novels, well that seems so much more doable and they sound so good too!
Posted by: Stefanie | March 19, 2010 at 08:19 AM
I saw both versions on PBS. Loved them both. Liked the color in the newer version.
I don't feel like reading the novels, though
Posted by: Isabel | March 19, 2010 at 04:56 PM
I loved the mini-series but I haven't read the book yet. I'm afraid to spoil the magic of the movie. I'd love to see it again.
Posted by: Mrs.B. | March 19, 2010 at 09:42 PM
Debby--The house plays a big role in the first book actually and Bosinney is part of the unhappiness in the book, but one of the few really likable characters!
BooksPlease--I've heard many good things about the movies and I wanted to try and read the books first. I've enjoyed what I've read but can't wait to finish the next book so I can watch the first part of the 2002 adaptation. I should probably read all three of the book from the first group, but I'm not sure I can wait.
Litove--I think you will like this. I have an omnibus edition, too, but I love these individual editions as it makes it easier to squeeze them in with my other reading.
Jennifer--I can easily tell from the story that this would make a great film. I want to get my hands on that 1967 version, too. Maybe Netflix has it?
Sakura--I have a feeling it is going to get more complex as I go. It's hard talking about the story without giving things away. I love these sorts of family dramas, though. And of course there is lots to think about as well within the story.
Jodie--Soames is such an interesting character. I wonder if he will ever loosen up. He's sort of the epitome of Victorian gentleman (though am using 'gentleman' loosely really), yet you can tell he's bothered too by the attitudes of the time--or at least his actions.
Margaret--Wow, that's a really wild story--to have played with him as a child! Which part did he play in the movie? I'm looking forward to picking up the second book soon.
Amy--Yes, there is lots to love with this one. I can't wait to read more.
Mary Ellen--The book put me off initially, too, but once you start you'll find you won't want to put it down.
Anna--I do that often--see a book I really want to read and know the timing is right, so just start it even though I am already reading something else!! Thanks for the link--unfortunately it went to a 'page not found' but I am in the general area so must take a look about.
Lyn--I'm almost not surprised that everyone would rather watch the Forsytes than go to church! Isn't that awful, but I am sure I would, too. I'd love to read the whole set by the end of the year, but that may be pushing it. I at least want to read the trilogies close together, so will start the second book soon.
Stefanie--That would be a chunkster of a book to have them all--I bet the print is tiny, too! :) It's seriously addicting reading, so don't let the size put you off.
Isabel--I've done that before-seen a good movie adaptation and then not felt the need to read the book. In this case I'm reading before watching, and the story is making me want to see the movie sooner than later.
Mrs. B.--I think they had to tinker with the story a bit on the 2002 version--not change it but tell it in a slightly different order as some things are learned through flashbacks that don't work well in film I have heard many good things about the film, but hopefully the books will stand up well against it!
Posted by: Danielle | March 19, 2010 at 10:04 PM
I have both adaptations of the Forsythe Saga(1967 and 2002)on DVD and now I am seriously tempted to read the books too. New project?!
Posted by: catharina | March 20, 2010 at 08:58 AM
Catharina--It's my new project for this year! I'm not sure I'll get all the books read but I am going to try! I have the newer adaptation but will look for the older one as well at some point.
Posted by: Danielle | March 20, 2010 at 05:29 PM
You may want to see if your library has this (or similar) book/s, I always think of Bosinney's Robin Hill as something similar to one of Lutyens' designs. http://www.amazon.com/Edwin-Lutyens-Country-Gavin-Stamp/dp/1580932371/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1269278451&sr=1-1
Posted by: Citronyella | March 22, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Citronyella--I'll have to see if my library has the book, so I can take a better look. I was wondering what it looked like--it sounded very modern and airy and open. I am looking forward to seeing the film as I expect they'll show the house and am curious about it. Thanks for the link!
Posted by: Danielle | March 22, 2010 at 10:06 PM