Although I've yet to find an author who can in any way replace Jane Austen, I think part of the reason I find Georgette Heyer's books so enjoyable is that she wrote stories that remind me of Jane Austen's world. Regency (most of the time) settings, sparkling wit and an entertaining banter between hero and heroine like Austen, often the stories are comedies of manner but Heyer also wrote the occasional adventure story or stories that verge on the farcical. They are usually frothy fun and nearly always end happily. Sylvester, or the Wicked Uncle is even more Austen-like as there is a definite nod in the direction of Austen's Pride and Prejudice. I wouldn't call it a retelling, but Sylvester reminds me just a tad of Mr. Darcy and Phoebe just a tad of Lizzie Bennet, but no worries as in the end they are their own characters full of foibles and shortcomings but essentially decent and likable.
If you've read Georgette Heyer you'll know that her stories are generally very romantically inclined yet also very chaste. It's all about the getting together rather than the what comes after (though there are a few exceptions to that rule). Sylvester, or the Wicked Uncle is one of Heyer's more romantic romances. With each insult (however kindly spoken) that is uttered, and each conversation which is miscommunicated the lovers are wrenched further apart, and that means they'll fall even harder when they do decide they really are in love.
Phoebe Marlow isn't exactly who comes to mind when the Duke of Salford, that would be Sylvester, is making his list of qualities he finds attractive in a prospective wife. He has indeed made a list: clever and with some degree of beauty, and with the same elegance which his mama is graced with. No hen-witted ladies as he doesn't want to hoist a fool on his mother. He narrows the ladies within his acquaintance who are so endowed down to five and then asks his mother to choose! For Sylvester this is simply an arrangement and love need not come into the picture, however much the Duchess prefers Sylvester make a love match or none at all.
Into the hat the Duchess throws Phoebe's name. Phoebe is the granddaughter of the Duchess's good friend and Sylvester's godmother, Lady Ingham. As a matter of fact there was talk at Phoebe's birth as the ladies toyed with the idea of a prospective engagement to Sylvester some day in the future, but nothing ever came of it as Phoebe's mother died and she was raised in the country. So the wheels are set in motion for Sylvester to properly meet Miss Marlow, but as his first introduction to her at a ball was so unmemorable, it won't be surprising to hear how their second meeting goes. Not well.
The Duke of Salford is invited to Lord Marlow's estate with offer of few days hunting, but of course his real intention is to check Phoebe out and decide whether she really is marriage material. He almost instantly regrets his decision when he realizes he is to be the only guest making it obvious that something's afoot. Phoebe's step-mother is under the misapprehension that Sylvester is there to offer for her, turning Phoebe into a bundle of nerves which means she isn't going to 'show well' in front of the Duke.
Sylvester's take on Phoebe:
"She had neither beauty nor countenance, her complexion was poor and her figure worse, her dress was tasteless, and the colourless voice in which she murmured how-do-you-do confirmed him in his instant belief that she was insipid. He wondered how soon he would be able to bring his visit to an end."
Phoebe's opinion of Sylvester is no better:
"He is not shy and he is not stiff. His manners are assured; he says everything that is civil because he places himself on so high a form that he would think it unworthy of himself to treat anyone with with anything but cool courtesy; and because he knows his consequence to be so great he cares nothing for what anyone may think of him."
Their meeting is dismal and their dislike great, though to be honest for Phoebe it is dislike, the Duke is so condescending he thinks only of himself and how he might escape. Phoebe beats him to it. In fear that he will offer for her, an offer that she finds repugnant, she decides to run away rather than be forced into a marriage she does not want. Her plan is to go to London and her grandmother, Lady Ingham. She sets off with her good childhood friend who's the son of a local squire, and from there the story turns quite adventurous. Snowy roads and an overturned barouche mean a broken leg for her friend Tom and a stay at a local inn where Sylvester comes upon them, and things become very entangled in the usual engaging Heyer style.
There's a good bit of romance in Sylvester and a good bit of adventure as well. Sylvester is overly full of himself, unable to show his true self in front of Phoebe and ready to believe the worst. Phoebe doesn't help things along much as she is an aspiring author who has had her first book published anonymously, though she makes the great error of basing her characters a little too closely on London's members of high society. Her villain shows too close a resemblance on the Duke of Salford--his eyebrows take on a satyr-like appearance when he's annoyed--making the comparison unmistakable, and when word gets out who wrote the book Phoebe becomes something of an outcast. It's unsure whether the two will ever get together. Getting things all sorted out is, of course, what makes for such entertaining reading. I've read enough novels by Heyer now to be able to compare and this one ranks in my top three (my other favorites being The Corinthian and A Civil Contract). Next up I have Bath Tangle to read, and will post about it later this month.
My copy courtesy of Sourcebooks.
Edited: I thought I'd note something that one commenter pointed out and is quite right about--although Heyer was inspired by Austen, Jane Austen wrote about her contemporaries and times in which she lived, whereas Heyer wrote historical novels about the Regency period and used quite a lot of detail to create that particular world. A perhaps not so subtle difference that I should have thought more about, but this novel brought to mind Austen so much the comparison came immediately to mind when writing my post! Sorry for the slip.
So nice to find you're also addicted to Georgette Heyer. Although I've found her mysteries and straight historical fiction (believe there was only one of these) to be o.k., my real passion is for her Regency Romances, most of which I've read many, many times. To me they're an almost perfect combination of witty dialogue and amusing situations, with enough depth to the characters to get you engaged in their frequently ridiculous and very funny situations. I think her novels hold up so well because Heyer was so exacting in her historical research---her descriptions of uniforms, social customs and slang are based on very exacting historical research and are quite accurate. I think of her Regency Romances as little souffles--very light, airy and delicious treats that could only be the product of a great deal of talent and technique!
P.S My own favorites, In addition to Sylvester, are The Black Sheep and Bath Tangle. I look forward to your posting on the last.
Posted by: janakay | August 04, 2011 at 09:26 PM
Janakay--Unlike so many other readers I only discovered Heyer a few years ago, so I am now making my way through her books. I have yet to read any of her mysteries, but I did read An Infamous Army (is that one of her historicals?). I love the Regency novels best, too. She is fun--her books are well written and impeccably researched--they are so easy to lose yourself in. They are my reliable go to books when I need some good fun escapism! Glad to hear you like Bath Tangle so much--something to look forward to--I've only just started it today. I will have to check out The Black Sheep as well--that's one I don't own. I always love hearing which books are other readers favorites!
Posted by: Danielle | August 04, 2011 at 09:47 PM
I came to Georgette Heyer only a couple of year ago - I'd always thought they might be a bit of fluff - but they completely blew me away with the writing, settings, characterisation and historical detail. I'm hooked now. I've not read Sylvester - on the list now!
Posted by: bibliolathas | August 04, 2011 at 11:58 PM
In your top three? That's high praise, I presume. I still have to read her and will, one day but every time someone writes about her (I wrote this before) I discover another title as every read has a favourite. I'll keep this one in mind in any case.
Posted by: Caroline | August 05, 2011 at 02:10 AM
Delighted you've now read Sylvester and thrilled to bits that it makes your top three. It makes mine too and is probably my favourite although Frederica and The Black Sheep give it a good run for its money. Lovely review.
Posted by: Cath | August 05, 2011 at 03:01 AM
I always thought Sylvester was the best of the rakes!
Posted by: Mystica | August 05, 2011 at 04:27 AM
I read all of Heyer except one or two of the historical novels more than 30 years ago... and still have virtually all of them in my library available whenever I need comfort food between the covers of a book. I have started replacing some with these nifty new editions that have come out.
I don't know if you know that some of the books are linked by certain characters (i.e. These Old Shades, Devil's Cub, Regency Buck and An Infamous Army). These latter are among my favorites of Heyer's books along with Black Sheep, Venetia, Frederica, and The Grand Sophy. And The Nonesuch.
Your blog is a good read -- I'm looking forward to reading more of your postings.
Posted by: AJ | August 05, 2011 at 07:26 AM
I love Sylvester and I love Phoebe, but, most of all, I adore the secondary characters in Sylvester. The steadfast Tom is a brick and who could be more delightfully silly than Sir Nugent Fotherby? I've lost count of how many times I've read this - it is definitely one of my favourite Heyer novels (alongside The Grand Sophy and A Civil Contract). Most recently, I listened to the Naxos audiobook read by Richard Armitage. I'm not usually a big fan of audio books, but bringing Richard Armitage and Georgette Heyer together? Inspired.
Posted by: Claire - The Captive Reader | August 05, 2011 at 10:44 AM
Ranks in the top three? That speaks pretty well for it. I really do need to get around to reading Heyer one of these days. You make her sound like such fun!
Posted by: Stefanie | August 05, 2011 at 11:25 AM
intriguing!
Posted by: bekah | August 05, 2011 at 01:42 PM
This would be in my top 3 as well along with Devils Cub and The Talisman Ring. Lovely review, I want to pull it of the shelf now.
Posted by: Desperate Reader | August 05, 2011 at 01:59 PM
I only read my first Heyer last year--The Civil Contract, which I liked very much. I did grab a couple (Cotillion and The Foundling) at the Borders liquidation, and I'm looking forward to giving those a try (although I see no one here has listed them as favorites).
Posted by: Teresa | August 05, 2011 at 06:14 PM
Bibliolathas--Even though her stories are very much on the light side, I think Heyer took her writing very seriously and was particular about getting details right.
Caroline--I've read about a dozen now. There was only one I didn't really like, but they are very enjoyable as easy, escapist reads. I think everyone has a different favorite!
Cath--Thanks! I have yet to read Frederica, but it is on my pile. Now that a few people have mentioned it I will be adding The Black Sheep to my list of 'wants' as well.
Mystica--Sylvester is an attractive rake, isn't he?! So self assured and condescending but....
AJ--I'm sorry it took me so long to discover Heyer, but am happy that I finally did. I am slowly making my way through her novels. I haven't yet read any mysteries, but find I love her Regencies! I also love these new editions that Sourcebooks is putting out. I didn't realize that some of the same characters reappear in other novels. Of your list I have read These Old Shades and An Infamous Army and am curious which characters recur. Otherwise I haven't read any of the other books you have mentioned though I have several on hand--I very much enjoy picking a new one up every so often. Thanks for the kind words and I do hope you stop back again--always love chatting with other readers!
Claire--I agree--her secondary characters are well done here--some are just as interesting as Sylvester and Phoebe--I almost wished she and Tom would have hit it off. Sir Nugent Fotherby is such a dandy--wouldn't this one make a great movie? I had heard that Richard Armitage had narrated some of her books, but this one was abridged, so I didn't buy it--now I am contemplating listening to it anyway as I love RA! :) Yes, very inspired thinking!!
Stefanie--She is fun. You should pick up one of her fun romps! I think there is at least one that is in the public domain that can be loaded onto an ereader, though I have yet to read it.
Bekah--If you like the period and historical novels Georgette Heyer is easy to get hooked on.
Desperate Reader--Her books are stories I could easily revisit. I loved The Talisman Ring, too. I like her more adventurous stories--with smugglers and hidden rooms in houses and swashbuckling getaways...Very fun.
Teresa-A Civil Contract is one of my favorites! I also bought a couple at the Borders sale--romance books were 30% off when everything else was only 10%...I have read both Cotillion and The Foundling (wrote about them, too--posts in my archives) and enjoyed them--but she has so many books I like a few of her others just a bit more. I have only read one Heyer that I didn't like. Some books are probably a bit better than others, but as good escapist fiction you can't almost beat her books.
Posted by: Danielle | August 05, 2011 at 09:12 PM
I know what you mean, I don't think anyone can replace Jane. I had a library patron today that had read (or maybe watched) Sense & Sensibility and asked What was the name of that other book she wrote?" !!!
I tried not to look aghast, and luckily, we had copies of all the other books. She walked away with P&P and Northanger Abbey. Best part of my day, actually!
Posted by: Karen K. | August 06, 2011 at 05:26 AM
Danielle,
The connection between the characters in those two books is only really clear if you read Devil's Cub and Regency Buck, particularly the former. I just remember being delighted when the pair from These Old Shades turned up in Devil's Cub and then the pair from the latter turned up in An Infamous Army (I won't give away the connection as it was fun to be surprised by it).
Speaking of film versions -- as I think someone was -- I love Austen as much as the next person -- but in my lifetime (I am not THAT old but still) Masterpiece Theatre has done three different complete series of Austen and three different series of Miss Marple, and yet no Heyer novels. Her mysteries in particular seem to be right up the PBS alley.
And while I am apparently on a mini-rant, why have they only filmed one (I think) Josephine Tey mystery.
I think she only wrote maybe 8 or 9 books, but she was great. Anyway ... sorry ... rambling off track.
Posted by: AJ | August 06, 2011 at 07:23 AM
This sounds like so much fun. The Pride and Prejudice story is such a great one, that it only makes sense that other writers would want to tell their own versions of it.
Posted by: Dorothy W. | August 06, 2011 at 06:43 PM
I think inevitably Heyer is quite different from Austen. Austen is more like a contemporary Helen Fielding because she's writing about her contemporaries doing what they do. Heyer uses the regency era to escape into - like a glittering fantasy world.
Sylvester is one of my favorites - there's a Heyer for every mood! I'm all "These Old Shades" for high drama, "Frederica" for humour, "Venetia" for sheer romance (Damarel is my favorite rake), "Bath Tangle" and "the Grand Sophy" for great fights, "Cotillion" for wit, froth and sweetness and "Sylvester" for an unusual heroine, great tension, humour and a magnificent pair of eyebrows (my favourite feature on any romance hero, ever).
His repression meets her irrepressibility which delightful consequences. She's got a great character arc, I'm totally with her as she grows in confidence and devastated when they have the awful row on the dancefloor and she faces social ruin. It's heartbreaking!
I think what I most love about Heyer heros and heroines are their imperfections. Phoebe is a great example, not that pretty, clever but hot-headed with front but no confidence and a great capacity for friendship.
Got to agree with the other comments though, the secondary characters are what makes this great. Tom, Sir Nugent and the little nephew make for a great interplay. I love the scene where Sir Nugent's boots are mangled!
Posted by: Margaret | August 06, 2011 at 07:49 PM
I must read more Heyer. Haven't picked up one of her books in a while but I should remedy that. This sounds so fun.
Posted by: iliana | August 07, 2011 at 07:57 PM
Karen--How does someone go through life not knowing all about Jane Austen? :) It is nice when you can give a patron what they are looking for--especially when it is something so good as Jane! They are in for a treat if they are just discovering her.
AJ--I'll add those books to my wishlist! It's fun when characters show up again in other novels. I think Georgette Heyer's novels would be great fun made into movies--such a great period to film and wonderful stories too. I agree with you on Josephine Tey's books as well--hadn't thought about those but they would also make great films. Rant away as I totally agree with you! :)
Dorothy--Georgette Heyer's books have been great right now as her books are sometimes all I can manage lately. This one was fun. I wonder how many writers and filmmakers have been inspired by P&P? Loads I bet.
Margaret--Thanks for the clarification--very right, and I've slightly changed my post so as not to give the wrong information to anyone stopping by. I've just started Bath Tangle and your description is very fitting! I have lots more great Heyer novels to look forward to, I see. She does do great characters--a few staples that seem to show up over and over, but they still have their own quirks and personalities. And yes Sir Nugent was a funny character--such a dandy with his boots.
Iliana--I seem to read a few every year and am slowly making my way through them. She wrote so many I think I'll have plenty to work on for a while!
Posted by: Danielle | August 08, 2011 at 12:29 AM
I haven't read a Heyer for a very long time but your post makes me want to get one now this minute!
My favourites, and they must have impressed me if I can recall them after 20-plus years, were Bath Tangle and Arabella so I will have to see if I can work out where I have stored my copies.
Posted by: Liz F | August 08, 2011 at 04:36 AM
Liz--I only recently discovered her and have been reading a few books every year--she's a good escapist author so I have a number of unread books by her on hand. I'm just starting Bath Tangle now and am enjoying it--I think I have Arabella, too! :)
Posted by: Danielle | August 08, 2011 at 08:35 PM
What a lovely review. I read Sylvester when I was ill and it really cheered me up. Georgette Heyer on good form isn't Jane Austen, but I completely agree she's the next best thing!
Posted by: litlove | August 09, 2011 at 03:51 AM
Litlove--Sylvester seems to be a universally liked Heyer novel! She is good for cheering up. I will always love Austen, but Heyer has her own style, too.
Posted by: Danielle | August 09, 2011 at 10:38 PM
This is definitely in my favorites list now too after reading it last month. If I had to choose three like you did, my others are The Nonesuch and Simon the Coldheart.
Posted by: Kristen M. | August 10, 2011 at 01:25 PM
Kristen--Some of the books I've read by her have faded away just a bit, but I think this one will stay with me and will definitely keep on hand for a reread. I've only read one of her historical novels--will have to check out Simon the Coldheart, and I've not read The Nonesuch yet either. It's interesting hearing which Heyer is a favorite for each reader!
Posted by: Danielle | August 10, 2011 at 09:22 PM