I wonder which side of the brain is assigned to tidiness. That is, tidiness in relation to reading and books. (Not in relation to dusting and vacuuming). I think I might have an especially well-developed side of the brain when it comes to bookish tasks. (But my brain seems to ignore other kinds of tidiness, it would seem). I've already got a notebook for next year. I used to keep one for jotting down notes on books I was reading, and it was always very helpful when I wanted to write about my reading here. Maybe it is due to my laxness in note taking this year that has caused me to become lazy about writing about my finishes (aside from the fact I have also been very lax about starting new books and not finishing them, I have finished a number of good reads that I have not written about). So, now the first of a few posts to try and rectify that, though the books are really all deserving of more thoughtful posts. Better a few brief mentions than none at all. And maybe next year will be better.
***
First up Katharine MacMahon, whose writing I love and happily will read any of her books and then reread them, too. In the case of The Alchemist's Daughter I listened to the novel on audio a long time ago and have had it in mind to read my way through all her books (I switched gears earlier this year after reading/revisiting The Crimson Rooms and The Woman in the Picture). I am very particular when it comes to audio books, but I have to say The Alchemist's Daughter was one of the best audio book experiences I have had. There was an exceptionally talented reader and she brought the story to life. I enjoyed reading the novel after the fact, too. Katharine MacMahon writes historical fiction really well, I think. Her stories are similar in style, but the settings are generally quite different. She may offer happy endings, but they never come without a price and they are not necessarily of the happily-ever-after variety. Yet every book by her I have read has been quite satisfying, too, both in the execution and in the storytelling.
The Alchemist's Daughter pits the rational against the emotional. Buckinghamshire, England ca. 1725. For Emilie Seldon, raised solely by her natural philosopher father, she is almost an embodiment of one of his experiments. She is nothing if not rational and has been raised practically in his laboratory. Both as his apprentice but also (not really understood by her) but as his subject as well. Her mother died in childbirth and her only female companionship and guidance is thanks the the household's cook. So Emilie is a very unique and intellectually astute young woman. She and her father have been long trying to accomplish a feat no other scientist has managed--to reintroduce life back to dead matter--a feat of alchemical sleight of hand if they can succeed.
Emilie may be pure rationality, yet she has a heart and a woman's soul and the two are awakened when an attractive Londoner arrives on the Selden's doorstep hoping to learn Emilie's father's alchemical secrets. She has no understanding of the emotions he awakens in her and falls for his pretty words and flattery. If there is a volatile reaction to the emotional chemistry young Robert Aislabie awakens, it's going to happen but with devastating results.
***
I thought I had written about Anne Enright's The Green Road, which I had so looked forward to reading, but it ended up being a rather uneven reading experience for me in the end. I'd never read Enright before, but I was sort of expecting and not surprised to find that there was a certain amount of melancholy in her storytelling. The Madigan family, about whom the novel centers on, reminds me a little of Jane Smiley's Langdons. Like the Smiley in scope, The Green Road takes place mostly in Ireland and over the span of thirty years or so following the four children growing up, growing apart and going away to vast corners of the world. It is probably very much a stereotype to say this, but it felt (but why shouldn't it be true, all things considered) a very Irish novel. What is so reminiscent between the two books is that there is no glossing over the relationships and how easy it is to hurt one another. Another story grounded in the realities of (often dysfunctional) family life.
Each Madigan child, and their mother Rosaleen, has their story to tell. What serves as a sort of framework to the story is the desire of Rosaleen to sell the family home, which is what provokes their gathering, their coming together in the end. The reader is given glimpses of the Madigan family from childhood and over the intervening years, and while told in a linear fashion it is done in fits and starts almost like a series of interlinked stories. Some I got on with better than others, mostly I felt like the Madigans weren't especially likable, which isn't certainly a requisite in any reading experience, but I think these elements are what created the uneven quality to the storytelling for me.
It is hard not to compare Enright's The Green Road to Colm Toibin's Brooklyn or Nora Webster, both of which I loved, but there is no denying that Enright is a masterful writer in terms of prose. The Green Road won a number of awards and I am glad I finally read something of her work. Eventually I will pick up another of her novels and hopefully the story will resonate with me more than this one did.
***
If the Enright didn't quite work for me, Maggie O'Farrell's This Must Be the Place certainly did. It's a pity I didn't write about it at the time I read it, since it might easily be a contender for year-end-favorite. This is another case of a story told from a variety of perspectives and again over time and distance. I like that one review called it a story told as if in "surround-sound". It is a sort of jigsaw puzzle of storytelling like forming a picture through a prism that you turn and see in a slightly different manner depending on how the pieces come together and fall apart. I thought it quite brilliant really how O'Farrell plays with narrators and in which voice (not just first or third person) the story is told.
This Must Be the Place is ultimately a contemporary love story, but one that starts out happily with characters coming together and then falling apart and maybe eventually coming together again (much like real life again). In this case, Irish-American Daniel meets the beautiful but singular (read that as bohemian who moves to her own tune) actress Claudette. They fall in love, have a family but all sorts of things get in the way to drive them apart. The story of their lives and love is told through the eyes of other family members and witnesses, all like planets orbiting around each other. If the chapters take on various perspectives that might seem almost like short stories (actually I never thought of the story in those terms), they were so tightly and nicely linked that it never felt like the reigns had been set down and picked up again by someone else--at least not to me.
I've read Maggie O'Farrell and was suitably impressed by her storytelling abilities all those years ago--so much so that she has become one of those authors who I have 'collected' over the years and will continue to do so. Now I just need to get around to reading more of her books rather than letting them sit unnoticed on my shelves.
***
Just one more for today. Mary Wesley is in the same category as Katharine MacMahon in that I love her writing, have read her before and will happily read and reread her again. I set out to do just this with all her books this year, but sadly I have thus far only managed A Sensible Life (I have quite a few 'must read all her works' authors so they all just keep carrying over from year to year, and that's okay). I was absolutely sure I had read this book before and was expecting certain things to happen and a twisty sort of ending, but apparently I just have looked at the book so many times I thought I had read it. In the end it was a happy surprise to find it was all new to me.
Like Katharine MacMahon (and I guess this is why I like both writers so much), they are reliably good storytellers of what you can easily call comfort reads, but there is still something a little more that sets them apart from mere entertainments. The writing is good, the storytelling exceptional in terms of style, plus there is the sense of the unpredictable to their novels, too. You know the story is going to be good, but it always ends up being really, really good, if you know what I mean.
The story begins in 1920s and the setting is the French seaside and poor Flora Trevelyan has two of the most narcissistic and neglectful parents you are likely ever to meet. She is essentially left on her own in an hotel with only a Russian emigré as a teacher and eats her meals alone with the serving staff. Younger than most of the other youthful guests she serves as a most keen observer of manners--both ill and happy. She falls for and in turn over time is fallen for by three very different young men. Time passes and Flora and the other guests move on to larger, fuller lives but their paths will cross later time and again in different circumstances. Flora, considering her upbringing, has no choice but to wish for and try to lead a 'sensible' life, but it is gratifying to know that happiness is still obtainable at the end of a very long road no matter how unexpected.
I'm happy to have revisited these books by writing about them so long after the fact of having read them. Thinking about them now makes me want to go pull books by any and all of the authors and discover something new . . .